ree
WRTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR SORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORBS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO1972-14
n14
Rk Avie t ?
oS wee
This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction
of Naval Record (DD Form 149).
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, gitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 August 2014, Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1800
MMSR-5 of 3 Jun 2014, & copy of which is enclosed.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accora@ingly, your application has been denied. The namer and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence of other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
-Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official
s on the applicant to demonstrate the
naval record, the burden 1
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
<\
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5248 13
pocument.ary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error OF injustice. applying for 4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3788 13
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1295 14
RB three-member panel of the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 April 2014, a copy of which +s attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3321 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC (memo. NR3321-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1821 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered yout application on 4 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable stacutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was snsufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0215 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) 5420 Ser 91/026 of 5 Mar 2014, a Copy of which was provided to you on i May 2014, and which is now enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NROO215-14 official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7128 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together wath all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3782 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support therecf and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9268 13
A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1643 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.